Your "predictions" are not insightful in the slightest. The charge of unwavering escalation can be equally leveled at Israel's enemies. On the contrary, to claim that Israel wants anything coherent(aside from reacting in predictable state like fashion) is absurd.
I think you are right. But I wonder where this desire to dominate comes from? What makes a man a rapist?
Maybe Zionism is a movement based on a feeling of inferiority. We want to be like our oppressors. While domination was a tool for the British Empire (e.g.), it became a desire for this tiny Colony?
I agree with you, but we-the-people, most of us, must accept the fact that TPTB in the U.S., who are FULLY supportive of Zionist Atrocities, are in the morally bankrupt driver's seat. So, the change must come from the global oligarchs. Despite their apparent insanity, there are some rational voices among them that are reading the riot act to them as we speak.
Hitler had this Nietsche baloney with the "Power of the Will". That morally bankrupt wishful thinking stupidity is exactly what, so far, has allowed TPTB to continue to double down on their rapacious, war loving, profit over people and planet modus operandi, despite their own scientists, at least the ones that still actually do cause and effect science, telling them 🚨 it is time to get Thelma and Louise out of the car, provided that there are a couple of parachutes in the rapidly descending 😬 car (Perhaps TPTB plan ahead?).
I know I'm being long winded, but the point here is that, The U.S. is NOT the BIG DOG NO MORE. That actually gives me hope. I may be wrong, but I really believe that MOST people in the world, along with their leaders, get it.
Our leaders in the so-called "West", REPRESENT the minority on planet Earth. Up until about a decade ago, said rapacious U.S. Empire and proxies called ALL the planet trashing shots. Now there s a new "sheriff" in town that is RATIONAL, unlike the Neocon, Zionist Social Darwinist, Nietsche Capitalist intellimorons. The BRICS crowd wants a viable biosphere and are NOT hampered by the Nietsche "power of the will" BULLSHIT.
When all is said and done, it is rather simple: Matthew 7:12 is NOT "OPTIONAL" for a viable biosphere and a thriving human civilization. I think the BRICS crowd, including particularly Russia and China, whether they be atheists or any non-Christian religion out there, have done the Matthew 7:12 BIOSPHERE MATH. They don't call it that, of course 😁; they call it a Multipolar World Community Based on Mutual Self Interest REPLACING the 👿💵🎩🦍 Rapacious Profit Over Planet Hegemony.
To me, it is simply doing reality based, cause and effect human behavioral science. The BRICS crowd understands that nations, not just individual persons, inevitably 🎍 reap what they 🌱 sow. They that sow socially constructive good will reap accordingly. They that sow socially destructive 😈💰 policies will reap social ☠️ destruction.
Thank you for your irrefutably accurate observations and wise analysis. Let me add my thoughts on the moral bankruptcy integral to the Zionist Ideology.
When people seriously study why the Zionist Ideology is so socially destructive, while, in depraved Orwellian fashion, Zionists sanctimoniously claim Zionism is “socially constructive”, the rotten ideological ROOT of Zionism is exposed:
It’s the SOCIAL DARWINISM.
Social Darwinists believe that ethics based principles are 'limitations pretending to be virtues'. To them, ethics are 'feel good illusions' that humans invented to pretend our species has empathy. To Social Darwinists, empathy is irrefutable evidence of inexcusable weakness. To them, all who are guided by ethics are deluded fools that should be eliminated from the human 'apex predator' gene pool for the "good" of our species.
Social Darwinists believe that the dictum, “survival of the fittest” (a term coined not by Charles Darwin but by sociologist Herbert Spencer), means that only the "fittest" should survive. Darwin's book published later ("Descent of Man") made it clear that Darwin completely supported the morally bankrupt views of Spencer.
The ideology of the Social Darwinist is indistinguishable from the despicable ideology of NAZI Germany, clearly exemplified in their brutally enforced morally bankrupt concentration camp law: “Eat your own bread, and if you can, that of your neighbor.”
Social Darwinism is the morally bankrupt world view that spawned the profit over people and planet neoliberal ideology. Neoliberal intellectuals like Friedrich von Hayek, Ludwig von Mises and Milton Friedman were all Social Darwinists long before they renamed laissez-faire liberalism (that had been thoroughly discredited by the Great Depression) with the catchy title of "Neoliberalism".The celebrated social theorist and geographer David Harvey explains that neoliberal ideology serves the following principle:
Quote
"There shall be no serious challenge to the absolute power of money to rule absolutely. And that power is to be exercised with one objective: Those possessed of money shall not only be privileged to accumulate wealth endlessly at will, but they shall have the right to inherit the earth, taking either direct or indirect dominion, not only of the land and all the resources and productive capacities that reside therein, but also assume absolute command, directly or indirectly, over the labor and creative capacities of all those others it needs. The rest of humanity shall be deemed disposable."
Great insight. The Orwellian strategy of permanent war for permanent peace and its trajectory for Israel appears to be exactly as you put it. Domination. It’s US overlords are all totally in sync with their own over arcing plan for ‘full spectrum dominance’ of the planet.
Zionist Israel is the poster boy for morally bankrupt Social Darwinism. The oligarchs running the U.S. Empire are birds of the exact same rotten Social Darwinist "feather".
🦉 The more salient take away, that everyone in the U.S. should GET, but too many living in our past "sole Superpower" 1990's era still delude themselves with, is that 📢 WE DON'T have the manpower, OR the technological prowess, to enable the ZioNazi morally bankrupt desires EITHER.
► 1. The U.S. cannot defeat Russia or China, or even Türkiye, for that matter, in a conventional war.
► 2. All the military "might" of NATO, excluding Türkiye, which NO WAY will abide by "article 5" baloney to attack Iran or Yemen (or Russia or China, for that matter) is a joke. Nukes are all the U.S. puppet NATO has. If they use them, we are all dead, so it is just plain STUPID to base NATO "might" on nukes.
► 3. The ZioNazi military "might" has always been a function of the U.S. Empire's ability to provide it with weapons and economic backing. The FACT IS that ain't enough any more due to the superior missile arsenal AND infantry might of Hezbollah. Iran's technological prowess and troop strength provide further evidence of that FACT to those who foolishly think even our hubris filled U.S.MIC, never mind belligerent pipsqueak Nutanyahoo, can take on Iran.
You provided another insight here that I have not seen anyone else make -- how Israel has had to deploy its political clout to suppress free speech in the United States and other countries. "You can't chant 'From the river to the sea' or we will have the police attack you! You are not allowed to wear a keffiyeh in your legislative chamber, even though you are an elected member of that government." Before, Israel would never have had to resort to such power plays. Such actions would not have happened, or they would have been so insignificant that the Zionists could have ignored them. Now, the domination is not happening naturally, so it has to be imposed by force. Using naked power is not a sign of strength -- it shows you can only get your way by smashing your opponents. Like when your dad has to beat you with his fists to make you clean up the mess you made in the living room instead of you just doing what he said because you know that he's right. Not YOUR dad, of course. I presume he was a good man.
I don't read EVERYONE's perspective on the Gaza issue, so maybe someone else has also put that thought out there. But I saw it from you first, so I credit you with this revelation. When I chat with my political friends at the anti-genocide actions here, I often cite the things you say which I have not seen elsewhere. Name-checking you with full credit, of course! I enjoy passing on knowledge, but I'm not such a skeever that I steal such ideas and claim them as my own.
Strong thesis. Hard to argue with, because that’s not only the way it looks at the international level, it’s been my personal experience as well. Dominance of the discourse, via the changing of definitions and the forbidding of words and concepts, for example. It was unmissable. And enraging.
Thank you for your profound expression of “dominance”
Nature dictates dominance. Humans, as part of nature are a primitive and ignorant race that are still grappling with civility vs dominance. Regretfully, we as a human race, are still at a very infancy level, when it comes to genuine civility!
If it was not pure luck, of course with due to thanks to Jupiter that absorbs most of the comets that could wipe the planet, we would not even be here.
We teach our children more about dominance, even in the sports they participate in, even with the win 🏆 stuff, than how to be fair and reasonable towards their fellow participants! And if they show too much genuine care, they may be perceived as weak or are after something!
This is the world we live in. Still at a very infancy level of civility.
Israel aside, who else in history that has ever held a dominant position has ever been anything to write home about, particularly Uncle Sam.
So, as far as I appreciate your analysis of the dire situation, I am also mindful, that if we ever ran out of the flesh we consume, there is more likely chance of us becoming more human flesh consumers, than simply turn in to more vegetarians!
Mind you Hitler was a vegeterian, and where the F did that get us!
Human Nature needs to evolve to higher levels of mutual care that regretfully gets in the way of greed and dominance, as you so aptly put it!
External threats aside, Perhaps another 100 thousand years or so, we may become more civilised towards each other. However, can the human race survive in the interim given our insatiable appetite for greed and dominance?
Thank you for your profound expression of “dominance”
Nature dictates dominance. Humans, as part of nature are a primitive and ignorant race that are still grappling with civility vs dominance. Regretfully, we as a human race, are still at a very infancy level, when it comes to genuine civility!
If it was not pure luck, of course with due to thanks to Jupiter that absorbs most of the comets that could wipe the planet, we would not even be here.
We teach our children more about dominance, even in the sports they participate in, even with the win 🏆 stuff, than how to be fair and reasonable towards their fellow participants! And if they show too much genuine care, they may be perceived as weak or are after something!
This is the world we live in. Still at a very infancy level of civility.
Israel aside, who else in history that has ever held a dominant position has ever been anything to write home about, particularly Uncle Sam.
So, as far as I appreciate your analysis of the dire situation, I am also mindful, that if we ever ran out of the flesh we consume, there is more likely chance of us becoming more human flesh consumers, than simply turn in to more vegetarians!
Mind you Hitler was a vegeterian, and where the F did that get us!
Human Nature needs to evolve to higher levels of mutual care that regretfully gets in the way of greed and dominance, as you so aptly put it!
External threats aside, Perhaps another 100 thousand years or so, we may become more civilised towards each other. However, can the human race survive in the interim given our insatiable appetite for greed and dominance?
Obviously Your personal experiences enable you to perceive deeply intuitively the patterns behind the actions and distractions of the aggressor .. thank you !
Would you like me to fix up the audio level in your post "What Israel Is Really After" for you?
I'm a musician and audio engineer in Australia... the audio level is way too soft and I could easily fix it for you and send you a video file with the corrected audio.
Just a free offer from me to you to try to do something to help de-colonise people's minds :)
I became a paid subscriber of yours earlier today when I wanted to read past the introduction of your "Decolonization or Death" post...
Brilliant. At the beginning, you touched on sadism. I hope to see another presentation where you expand on this disorder and its role in Dominance.
You're like my moral compass Alon, thank you so much.
Thank you, Jane
Your "predictions" are not insightful in the slightest. The charge of unwavering escalation can be equally leveled at Israel's enemies. On the contrary, to claim that Israel wants anything coherent(aside from reacting in predictable state like fashion) is absurd.
I think you are right. But I wonder where this desire to dominate comes from? What makes a man a rapist?
Maybe Zionism is a movement based on a feeling of inferiority. We want to be like our oppressors. While domination was a tool for the British Empire (e.g.), it became a desire for this tiny Colony?
Netanyahu is like Captain Ahab; he and his Social Darwinist ilk = Zionists are on a doomed whale hunt.
soberthinking.createaforum.com/gallery/soberthinking/2785-8211-H.png
I agree with you, but we-the-people, most of us, must accept the fact that TPTB in the U.S., who are FULLY supportive of Zionist Atrocities, are in the morally bankrupt driver's seat. So, the change must come from the global oligarchs. Despite their apparent insanity, there are some rational voices among them that are reading the riot act to them as we speak.
Hitler had this Nietsche baloney with the "Power of the Will". That morally bankrupt wishful thinking stupidity is exactly what, so far, has allowed TPTB to continue to double down on their rapacious, war loving, profit over people and planet modus operandi, despite their own scientists, at least the ones that still actually do cause and effect science, telling them 🚨 it is time to get Thelma and Louise out of the car, provided that there are a couple of parachutes in the rapidly descending 😬 car (Perhaps TPTB plan ahead?).
I know I'm being long winded, but the point here is that, The U.S. is NOT the BIG DOG NO MORE. That actually gives me hope. I may be wrong, but I really believe that MOST people in the world, along with their leaders, get it.
Our leaders in the so-called "West", REPRESENT the minority on planet Earth. Up until about a decade ago, said rapacious U.S. Empire and proxies called ALL the planet trashing shots. Now there s a new "sheriff" in town that is RATIONAL, unlike the Neocon, Zionist Social Darwinist, Nietsche Capitalist intellimorons. The BRICS crowd wants a viable biosphere and are NOT hampered by the Nietsche "power of the will" BULLSHIT.
When all is said and done, it is rather simple: Matthew 7:12 is NOT "OPTIONAL" for a viable biosphere and a thriving human civilization. I think the BRICS crowd, including particularly Russia and China, whether they be atheists or any non-Christian religion out there, have done the Matthew 7:12 BIOSPHERE MATH. They don't call it that, of course 😁; they call it a Multipolar World Community Based on Mutual Self Interest REPLACING the 👿💵🎩🦍 Rapacious Profit Over Planet Hegemony.
To me, it is simply doing reality based, cause and effect human behavioral science. The BRICS crowd understands that nations, not just individual persons, inevitably 🎍 reap what they 🌱 sow. They that sow socially constructive good will reap accordingly. They that sow socially destructive 😈💰 policies will reap social ☠️ destruction.
Thank you for your irrefutably accurate observations and wise analysis. Let me add my thoughts on the moral bankruptcy integral to the Zionist Ideology.
When people seriously study why the Zionist Ideology is so socially destructive, while, in depraved Orwellian fashion, Zionists sanctimoniously claim Zionism is “socially constructive”, the rotten ideological ROOT of Zionism is exposed:
It’s the SOCIAL DARWINISM.
Social Darwinists believe that ethics based principles are 'limitations pretending to be virtues'. To them, ethics are 'feel good illusions' that humans invented to pretend our species has empathy. To Social Darwinists, empathy is irrefutable evidence of inexcusable weakness. To them, all who are guided by ethics are deluded fools that should be eliminated from the human 'apex predator' gene pool for the "good" of our species.
Social Darwinists believe that the dictum, “survival of the fittest” (a term coined not by Charles Darwin but by sociologist Herbert Spencer), means that only the "fittest" should survive. Darwin's book published later ("Descent of Man") made it clear that Darwin completely supported the morally bankrupt views of Spencer.
The ideology of the Social Darwinist is indistinguishable from the despicable ideology of NAZI Germany, clearly exemplified in their brutally enforced morally bankrupt concentration camp law: “Eat your own bread, and if you can, that of your neighbor.”
Social Darwinism is the morally bankrupt world view that spawned the profit over people and planet neoliberal ideology. Neoliberal intellectuals like Friedrich von Hayek, Ludwig von Mises and Milton Friedman were all Social Darwinists long before they renamed laissez-faire liberalism (that had been thoroughly discredited by the Great Depression) with the catchy title of "Neoliberalism".The celebrated social theorist and geographer David Harvey explains that neoliberal ideology serves the following principle:
Quote
"There shall be no serious challenge to the absolute power of money to rule absolutely. And that power is to be exercised with one objective: Those possessed of money shall not only be privileged to accumulate wealth endlessly at will, but they shall have the right to inherit the earth, taking either direct or indirect dominion, not only of the land and all the resources and productive capacities that reside therein, but also assume absolute command, directly or indirectly, over the labor and creative capacities of all those others it needs. The rest of humanity shall be deemed disposable."
Agree- "Those possessed of money" like Bezos, Zukerberg, Musk, Gates, etc etc" assume absolute command of what we can read, post, think....
Great insight. The Orwellian strategy of permanent war for permanent peace and its trajectory for Israel appears to be exactly as you put it. Domination. It’s US overlords are all totally in sync with their own over arcing plan for ‘full spectrum dominance’ of the planet.
Zionist Israel is the poster boy for morally bankrupt Social Darwinism. The oligarchs running the U.S. Empire are birds of the exact same rotten Social Darwinist "feather".
🦉 The more salient take away, that everyone in the U.S. should GET, but too many living in our past "sole Superpower" 1990's era still delude themselves with, is that 📢 WE DON'T have the manpower, OR the technological prowess, to enable the ZioNazi morally bankrupt desires EITHER.
► 1. The U.S. cannot defeat Russia or China, or even Türkiye, for that matter, in a conventional war.
► 2. All the military "might" of NATO, excluding Türkiye, which NO WAY will abide by "article 5" baloney to attack Iran or Yemen (or Russia or China, for that matter) is a joke. Nukes are all the U.S. puppet NATO has. If they use them, we are all dead, so it is just plain STUPID to base NATO "might" on nukes.
► 3. The ZioNazi military "might" has always been a function of the U.S. Empire's ability to provide it with weapons and economic backing. The FACT IS that ain't enough any more due to the superior missile arsenal AND infantry might of Hezbollah. Iran's technological prowess and troop strength provide further evidence of that FACT to those who foolishly think even our hubris filled U.S.MIC, never mind belligerent pipsqueak Nutanyahoo, can take on Iran.
You provided another insight here that I have not seen anyone else make -- how Israel has had to deploy its political clout to suppress free speech in the United States and other countries. "You can't chant 'From the river to the sea' or we will have the police attack you! You are not allowed to wear a keffiyeh in your legislative chamber, even though you are an elected member of that government." Before, Israel would never have had to resort to such power plays. Such actions would not have happened, or they would have been so insignificant that the Zionists could have ignored them. Now, the domination is not happening naturally, so it has to be imposed by force. Using naked power is not a sign of strength -- it shows you can only get your way by smashing your opponents. Like when your dad has to beat you with his fists to make you clean up the mess you made in the living room instead of you just doing what he said because you know that he's right. Not YOUR dad, of course. I presume he was a good man.
I don't read EVERYONE's perspective on the Gaza issue, so maybe someone else has also put that thought out there. But I saw it from you first, so I credit you with this revelation. When I chat with my political friends at the anti-genocide actions here, I often cite the things you say which I have not seen elsewhere. Name-checking you with full credit, of course! I enjoy passing on knowledge, but I'm not such a skeever that I steal such ideas and claim them as my own.
Strong thesis. Hard to argue with, because that’s not only the way it looks at the international level, it’s been my personal experience as well. Dominance of the discourse, via the changing of definitions and the forbidding of words and concepts, for example. It was unmissable. And enraging.
Everything and that still won't be enough!
Thank you for your profound expression of “dominance”
Nature dictates dominance. Humans, as part of nature are a primitive and ignorant race that are still grappling with civility vs dominance. Regretfully, we as a human race, are still at a very infancy level, when it comes to genuine civility!
If it was not pure luck, of course with due to thanks to Jupiter that absorbs most of the comets that could wipe the planet, we would not even be here.
We teach our children more about dominance, even in the sports they participate in, even with the win 🏆 stuff, than how to be fair and reasonable towards their fellow participants! And if they show too much genuine care, they may be perceived as weak or are after something!
This is the world we live in. Still at a very infancy level of civility.
Israel aside, who else in history that has ever held a dominant position has ever been anything to write home about, particularly Uncle Sam.
So, as far as I appreciate your analysis of the dire situation, I am also mindful, that if we ever ran out of the flesh we consume, there is more likely chance of us becoming more human flesh consumers, than simply turn in to more vegetarians!
Mind you Hitler was a vegeterian, and where the F did that get us!
Human Nature needs to evolve to higher levels of mutual care that regretfully gets in the way of greed and dominance, as you so aptly put it!
External threats aside, Perhaps another 100 thousand years or so, we may become more civilised towards each other. However, can the human race survive in the interim given our insatiable appetite for greed and dominance?
🙏
Thank you for your profound expression of “dominance”
Nature dictates dominance. Humans, as part of nature are a primitive and ignorant race that are still grappling with civility vs dominance. Regretfully, we as a human race, are still at a very infancy level, when it comes to genuine civility!
If it was not pure luck, of course with due to thanks to Jupiter that absorbs most of the comets that could wipe the planet, we would not even be here.
We teach our children more about dominance, even in the sports they participate in, even with the win 🏆 stuff, than how to be fair and reasonable towards their fellow participants! And if they show too much genuine care, they may be perceived as weak or are after something!
This is the world we live in. Still at a very infancy level of civility.
Israel aside, who else in history that has ever held a dominant position has ever been anything to write home about, particularly Uncle Sam.
So, as far as I appreciate your analysis of the dire situation, I am also mindful, that if we ever ran out of the flesh we consume, there is more likely chance of us becoming more human flesh consumers, than simply turn in to more vegetarians!
Mind you Hitler was a vegeterian, and where the F did that get us!
Human Nature needs to evolve to higher levels of mutual care that regretfully gets in the way of greed and dominance, as you so aptly put it!
External threats aside, Perhaps another 100 thousand years or so, we may become more civilised towards each other. However, can the human race survive in the interim given our insatiable appetite for greed and dominance?
🙏
Brilliant
Obviously Your personal experiences enable you to perceive deeply intuitively the patterns behind the actions and distractions of the aggressor .. thank you !
Hi Alon
Would you like me to fix up the audio level in your post "What Israel Is Really After" for you?
I'm a musician and audio engineer in Australia... the audio level is way too soft and I could easily fix it for you and send you a video file with the corrected audio.
Just a free offer from me to you to try to do something to help de-colonise people's minds :)
I became a paid subscriber of yours earlier today when I wanted to read past the introduction of your "Decolonization or Death" post...
Greg
Hey Greg, thanks a lot for the offer, and if it's no trouble I'd appreciate it very much, I'm not the most technical sort myself
Ok, I’ll do the edit and then send you a Dropbox link for you to download the file with the corrected volume. Should be in the next hour…